
LAWYER SPECIALISING IN DISMISSAL CASES IN MUNICH
Challenge a dismissal or negotiate a severance package

FOCUS: Top Rechtsanwalt Arbeitsrecht 2022–2025
Best Lawyers: „Beste Anwälte“ 2022–2025
Handelsblatt: „Beste Anwälte“ Arbeitsrecht 2022–2025
Stern: „Beste Anwaltskanzlei“ Arbeitsrecht 2022, 2023, 2025
ISO 9001:2015-Zertifizierung
Following a notice of termination, it is crucial to first gain a clear understanding of your situation. As employment lawyers specialising in termination cases in Munich, we assess deadlines, risks and your realistic options once you have received the notice of termination – with the aim of achieving the best possible outcome for you.
What is crucial now in the event of termination
- 3-week notice period: The date of receipt is decisive; the 21-day period begins from then
- Dismissals are often open to challenge: form, notice period, selection of employees for redundancy, and grounds are common points of contention
- Severance pay is a matter of negotiation: the amount depends on risk and strategy, not on ‘entitlement’
- Secure the evidence today: receipt, envelope, delivery, witnesses. Do not sign anything!
- We clarify costs early on: legal protection is often available; otherwise, we provide a financial assessment
Challenge a dismissal
Not every dismissal is valid. We will check whether there are any procedural errors, breaches of notice periods or issues relating to employment protection criteria that could be challenged, and what realistic options are available to you.
Negotiating a severance package
Severance payments are rarely granted automatically. They are usually the result of legal pressure and a strong negotiating position vis-à-vis the employer.
Check the deadline & avoid mistakes
Once a notice of termination has been given, there are strict deadlines to follow. If you wait too long or react too hastily, you often lose out on options. We’ll show you what matters now and what you should avoid.
The three-week period
The key factor is when the notice of termination is received. The 21-day period begins from that point. Within this period, it must be assessed whether legal action is advisable. Once the deadline has passed, the notice of termination is in many cases deemed valid – regardless of whether it would originally have been open to challenge. The deadline is not intended to exert pressure, but to provide clarity. Those who are aware of it and understand it properly retain control over the next steps.
Example:
If you receive the notice of termination on 5 May, the period ends on 26 May. A decision must be made by this date as to whether and how to respond.
Don’t sign anything until we’ve assessed the situation.
Don’t rush into explaining anything via WhatsApp, email or the phone.
Record the time and date of access. Document the envelope, delivery and witnesses.
With legal protection
Cases involving dismissal under employment law are often covered. The key factors are the policy, the start date of the cover and any excesses. We will check for you whether and to what extent your legal expenses insurance applies – transparently and with no hassle for you.
Without legal protection
Even without insurance, an initial legal assessment is both advisable and possible. We’ll discuss openly what steps are realistically feasible and whether taking action is worthwhile from a financial perspective. You’ll receive a clear assessment – with no obligation and no unnecessary steps.
Call now or
request a callback
You decide how you’d like to get in touch. You can either speak to us directly by phone or leave a request for a callback.
Short consultation
(10–15 minutes)
Based on your description, we will check the validity of the notice of termination, relevant deadlines and potential risks. You will receive a clear initial assessment of your situation.
Clear guidance &
next steps
We’ll tell you what the next sensible step is. You’ll then know which options are realistic and what you need to bear in mind.
Challenge a dismissal
Who this is suitable for
Challenging a dismissal is particularly worth considering if you wish to keep your job or if there are doubts as to whether the dismissal was legally valid.
What are realistic goals
Depending on the circumstances, the aim may be continued employment, a court-mediated settlement or significantly improved terms as part of a termination.
Typical employer errors
In practice, dismissals are not always properly justified or formally correct. We will examine whether there are grounds for challenging the dismissal in your specific case.
Negotiating a severance package
When this is the right course of action
A severance payment is particularly advisable if a return to the company is not desired or if a mutually agreed termination of the employment relationship – for example, via a termination agreement – is on the cards.
What determines the amount
Key factors include length of service, age, maintenance obligations, legal risks for the employer and the course of the proceedings.
Realistic expectations
Severance payments fall within ranges, not guarantees. Our task is to realistically assess your negotiating position and use it strategically.
Your contacts for employment law
Our employment law team comprises several specialist solicitors and lawyers specialising in employment law. We will assign you a dedicated point of contact who will manage your case independently and guide you clearly through the next steps.
“Anyone who has ever been made redundant knows exactly what goes through your mind. Mr Mauritz not only secured the best possible outcome for me, but also put my mind completely at ease with his pleasant, pragmatic manner. I highly recommend him!”
— Employee, Munich
“Dr Bronhofer, a solicitor, represented me very successfully and efficiently in a dismissal dispute, achieving an excellent outcome. He was always available and I always felt I was in good hands.”
— Employee, Munich
“Dr Bronhofer represented me very well as an employee following a redundancy. With his extensive expertise and valuable advice, he helped me reach an out-of-court settlement that was more than acceptable to me. He was always easy to get hold of and replied promptly. As for my reference, his suggestions were extremely valuable.”
— Employee, Munich



